ED BALLS AW TannerThis is a featured page

An explicit account of a letter written to Rt.. Hon. Ed Balls Minister for Children 30 Nov 2008..


Despite the serious dysfunctional behaviour of Haringey re childcare, the government wants to hide evidence regarding this despotic regime. This council is in complete contempt re democracy, withholding evidence from police and the PPS in regard the death of a child in care! Holding back such evidence is not what parliament is all about!
Ministers should not pull the plug on transparency!

Your department claims that some Haringey incompetents will stay because they might be needed to give evidence in any future Haringey child neglect? People are afraid that some who should be kicked out - will remain? This 5th column of yours will soon be 'seen off' by the Stasi-style hounding operating within the council.

If you are concerned about the abuse and deaths of children in care, then you have to give serious consideration to the root cause - unfit unregulated councils!
Placid regulators like ombudsman, with friendly 'slap on wrist' judgments have done much to secure the entrenchment of the 'old pals act'

Many councils have become omnipotent, having been encouraged by LG Os to deal dismissively with complainants. Because of this the electorate with many a genuine grievance has become victims of deceitful council complaints procedures. This failure to regulate councils by normal public criticism has allowed the breakdown of the democratic process of accountability.

These restrictions put upon council critics have denied public scrutiny. This protection allowed unrestrained council miscreants to put themselves above the law? This has allowed dysfunctional, often contemptuous Town Hall monstrosities to grow within our midst protected by political agenda!
There is also concern that the atrocious harassment of critics may well continue using the usual public sector machinery. One hopes the Haringey whistleblower gets some recognition for her heroic fightback against revengeful council hounding.

It is appalling that MPs have sat in parliament espousing the virtues of councils, even giving them more power, when in reality councils are in more need of regulation than the discredited Banking system.

A claim has been made that 'IF' failures were found in the Haringey report, action would be taken? The electorate is now well aware of numerous failures, and are even more aware that the ministerial 'old pals act' is liable to kick in! Why is this eagerly awaited report being shrouded in political mystery? Are you trying to protect a minister or two?

One has to start seriously thinking as to what's wrong with councils?

Whilst Haringey were browbeating whistleblowers; paedophiles were known to have worked under the noses of lax social workers. Even more frightening, is that networking paedophiles can infiltrate council care homes at will; where senior council officials have been known to shrug of criticism regarding these abominations, threatening the honorable critics with disciplinary action?
We cannot put too much faith in councils or care officials! In a previous child abuse case, parents wrote to an official in charge of complaints; nothing was ever done? It transpired that the official in charge of complaints was a prolific child abuser! Obviously written complaints regarding child abuse were binned - that's how corrupt councils operate!

In another case re social worker abuse, children of innocent parents wrongly accused of 'satanic abuse', were put into care. A few years later a TV documentary did a 'follow up' on them, they were by then teenagers, still traumatised and broken as individuals
by this council/social worker crime. The teenagers showed much hatred towards these uncaring unregulated social workers.

Why were these barbaric acts by unregulated council employees allowed to continue for so long?
It was in this case that the victimised parents complained, then thuggish council officials slapped a gagging order upon them? One begins to realise just how many council despots are above the law!

Reputable social workers stay well clear of such appalling councils, honest reliable social workers would not seek work in Haringey, knowing that if they spoke out about incompetent management failure (almost guaranteed) they'd be hounded out!

It becomes apparent, because of the numerous abuse cases arising from severely dysfunctional councils, that childcare has become an insignificant part of a political system run by council officials. It becomes evident because of so much incompetence in this field, that continuing scandalous social work disasters are being picked up daily.

So much so, that Ofsted suggest that on average, one child known to be on the 'at risk' register dies from cruelty, neglect or abuse every week?

There has always been much cover up within councils, the Auditing Ofsted Office helped to give Haringey a clean bill of health; by some mysterious act it gave this seriously dysfunctional Haringey council a '3 star status' for good practice. (we now know Haringey force-fed Ofsted false figures - lies?) One hopes that Haringey's severe neglect of childcare along with its attendant cover-up culture is not considered 'good practice'?

Such collusive acts are designed to deceive the public into believing that incompetent corrupt councils are in good working order. Typical public sector deceit!
This political junketing '3 star status' gave this deceitful council an unwarranted uplift, doing more damage by maintaining despots in office.
Were these politically inspired '3 star' embellishments given to the highly protected council imbeciles, who could not spot a severely battered baby from 2 feet?

Stonewalling has become an art form within many councils. But when genuine up-front request for information regarding the death of Baby P was denied the police and the PPS, then one realised that such despotic denial of ones public duty by senior Haringey officials had become politically perverse. A child was tortured on their watch, they become unduly self-protective - hostile in denial where no one was to blame.
The abuse of public duty was complete!

How come this swashbuckling subversive mentality, forever in denial of transparency found itself in charge of child care?

After years of systematic failure one would have hoped the quality of social workers would, by now improved.
However, I have recently read an account by a qualified social worker regarding a group of social work students, I quote;
"in our two years at university, we had 6 sessions in childcare, child development and child protection and 42 sessions on Marxist theory .....Some of my former colleagues are senior managers or directors of social services, the sort pf people responsible for decision making in the Baby P's of this world".

A childcare curriculum within a seat of learning, where the protection of children should be foremost, was being muzzled by political theory. The proper study of childcare was being neglected in favour of political dogmas.
Childcare has evolved within many a lawless regime, often run by people quite unfit to work within childcare, many were like swashbuckling subversives. The care of children become enmeshed in devious 'inner politics' where their welfare become secondary! That's how corrupt councils operate!

Councils are largely run by incompetents, where avoidance of honest public service is highly developed and self-protective. Snooping has become the 'in thing'; where for instance wheelie-bin Inspectorate is most subversive! All this low-grade council chicanery has found its way into childcare.

It is quite an eye-opener, a definitive lesson in Town Hall corruption of facts, where fraud, incompetence and corruption big-time earns a '3star status gong' for good practice? I begin to see Orwell as a genius!

The continuing question causing the public so much annoyance is 'why are these guilty monsters not resigning'? The answer has to be "they are on a nice little earner"! Where else would you get paid so much for being so neglectful, and contributing so little to child protection?

It really says it all in regard to the public sectors 'cover up culture' - where everyone is guilty but no one is to blame, even exonerated for the most ghastly of failures!
Yours sincerely AW Tanner










Posted Anonymously Latest page update: made by Anonymous , Dec 7 2008, 6:18 AM EST (about this update About This Update Posted Anonymously Edited anonymously

1318 words added

view changes

- complete history)
More Info: links to this page

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.